The energy balance model of obesity: beyond calories in, calories out

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The energy balance model of obesity : beyond calories in, calories out. / Hall, Kevin D.; Farooqi, I. Sadaf; Friedman, Jeffery M.; Klein, Samuel; Loos, Ruth J.F.; Mangelsdorf, David J.; O'Rahilly, Stephen; Ravussin, Eric; Redman, Leanne M.; Ryan, Donna H.; Speakman, John R.; Tobias, Deirdre K.

In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 115, No. 5, 2022, p. 1243-1254.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hall, KD, Farooqi, IS, Friedman, JM, Klein, S, Loos, RJF, Mangelsdorf, DJ, O'Rahilly, S, Ravussin, E, Redman, LM, Ryan, DH, Speakman, JR & Tobias, DK 2022, 'The energy balance model of obesity: beyond calories in, calories out', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1243-1254. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac031

APA

Hall, K. D., Farooqi, I. S., Friedman, J. M., Klein, S., Loos, R. J. F., Mangelsdorf, D. J., O'Rahilly, S., Ravussin, E., Redman, L. M., Ryan, D. H., Speakman, J. R., & Tobias, D. K. (2022). The energy balance model of obesity: beyond calories in, calories out. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 115(5), 1243-1254. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac031

Vancouver

Hall KD, Farooqi IS, Friedman JM, Klein S, Loos RJF, Mangelsdorf DJ et al. The energy balance model of obesity: beyond calories in, calories out. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2022;115(5):1243-1254. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac031

Author

Hall, Kevin D. ; Farooqi, I. Sadaf ; Friedman, Jeffery M. ; Klein, Samuel ; Loos, Ruth J.F. ; Mangelsdorf, David J. ; O'Rahilly, Stephen ; Ravussin, Eric ; Redman, Leanne M. ; Ryan, Donna H. ; Speakman, John R. ; Tobias, Deirdre K. / The energy balance model of obesity : beyond calories in, calories out. In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2022 ; Vol. 115, No. 5. pp. 1243-1254.

Bibtex

@article{ff038541a88d44a5b695b6c18f524539,
title = "The energy balance model of obesity: beyond calories in, calories out",
abstract = "A recent Perspective article described the {"}carbohydrate-insulin model (CIM){"} of obesity, asserting that it {"}better reflects knowledge on the biology of weight control{"} as compared with what was described as the {"}dominant energy balance model (EBM),{"} which fails to consider {"}biological mechanisms that promote weight gain.{"} Unfortunately, the Perspective conflated and confused the principle of energy balance, a law of physics that is agnostic as to obesity mechanisms, with the EBM as a theoretical model of obesity that is firmly based on biology. In doing so, the authors presented a false choice between the CIM and a caricature of the EBM that does not reflect modern obesity science. Here, we present a more accurate description of the EBM where the brain is the primary organ responsible for body weight regulation operating mainly below our conscious awareness via complex endocrine, metabolic, and nervous system signals to control food intake in response to the body's dynamic energy needs as well as environmental influences. We also describe the recent history of the CIM and show how the latest {"}most comprehensive formulation{"} abandons a formerly central feature that required fat accumulation in adipose tissue to be the primary driver of positive energy balance. As such, the new CIM can be considered a special case of the more comprehensive EBM but with a narrower focus on diets high in glycemic load as the primary factor responsible for common obesity. We review data from a wide variety of studies that address the validity of each model and demonstrate that the EBM is a more robust theory of obesity than the CIM.",
keywords = "carbohydrates, energy balance, food intake, insulin, obesity",
author = "Hall, {Kevin D.} and Farooqi, {I. Sadaf} and Friedman, {Jeffery M.} and Samuel Klein and Loos, {Ruth J.F.} and Mangelsdorf, {David J.} and Stephen O'Rahilly and Eric Ravussin and Redman, {Leanne M.} and Ryan, {Donna H.} and Speakman, {John R.} and Tobias, {Deirdre K.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2022.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1093/ajcn/nqac031",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "1243--1254",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0002-9165",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The energy balance model of obesity

T2 - beyond calories in, calories out

AU - Hall, Kevin D.

AU - Farooqi, I. Sadaf

AU - Friedman, Jeffery M.

AU - Klein, Samuel

AU - Loos, Ruth J.F.

AU - Mangelsdorf, David J.

AU - O'Rahilly, Stephen

AU - Ravussin, Eric

AU - Redman, Leanne M.

AU - Ryan, Donna H.

AU - Speakman, John R.

AU - Tobias, Deirdre K.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2022.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - A recent Perspective article described the "carbohydrate-insulin model (CIM)" of obesity, asserting that it "better reflects knowledge on the biology of weight control" as compared with what was described as the "dominant energy balance model (EBM)," which fails to consider "biological mechanisms that promote weight gain." Unfortunately, the Perspective conflated and confused the principle of energy balance, a law of physics that is agnostic as to obesity mechanisms, with the EBM as a theoretical model of obesity that is firmly based on biology. In doing so, the authors presented a false choice between the CIM and a caricature of the EBM that does not reflect modern obesity science. Here, we present a more accurate description of the EBM where the brain is the primary organ responsible for body weight regulation operating mainly below our conscious awareness via complex endocrine, metabolic, and nervous system signals to control food intake in response to the body's dynamic energy needs as well as environmental influences. We also describe the recent history of the CIM and show how the latest "most comprehensive formulation" abandons a formerly central feature that required fat accumulation in adipose tissue to be the primary driver of positive energy balance. As such, the new CIM can be considered a special case of the more comprehensive EBM but with a narrower focus on diets high in glycemic load as the primary factor responsible for common obesity. We review data from a wide variety of studies that address the validity of each model and demonstrate that the EBM is a more robust theory of obesity than the CIM.

AB - A recent Perspective article described the "carbohydrate-insulin model (CIM)" of obesity, asserting that it "better reflects knowledge on the biology of weight control" as compared with what was described as the "dominant energy balance model (EBM)," which fails to consider "biological mechanisms that promote weight gain." Unfortunately, the Perspective conflated and confused the principle of energy balance, a law of physics that is agnostic as to obesity mechanisms, with the EBM as a theoretical model of obesity that is firmly based on biology. In doing so, the authors presented a false choice between the CIM and a caricature of the EBM that does not reflect modern obesity science. Here, we present a more accurate description of the EBM where the brain is the primary organ responsible for body weight regulation operating mainly below our conscious awareness via complex endocrine, metabolic, and nervous system signals to control food intake in response to the body's dynamic energy needs as well as environmental influences. We also describe the recent history of the CIM and show how the latest "most comprehensive formulation" abandons a formerly central feature that required fat accumulation in adipose tissue to be the primary driver of positive energy balance. As such, the new CIM can be considered a special case of the more comprehensive EBM but with a narrower focus on diets high in glycemic load as the primary factor responsible for common obesity. We review data from a wide variety of studies that address the validity of each model and demonstrate that the EBM is a more robust theory of obesity than the CIM.

KW - carbohydrates

KW - energy balance

KW - food intake

KW - insulin

KW - obesity

U2 - 10.1093/ajcn/nqac031

DO - 10.1093/ajcn/nqac031

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35134825

AN - SCOPUS:85127640473

VL - 115

SP - 1243

EP - 1254

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0002-9165

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 307099793