Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality : systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. / Li, Jun; Guasch-Ferré, Marta; Li, Yanping; Hu, Frank B.

In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 112, No. 1, 2020, p. 150-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Li, J, Guasch-Ferré, M, Li, Y & Hu, FB 2020, 'Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz349

APA

Li, J., Guasch-Ferré, M., Li, Y., & Hu, F. B. (2020). Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 112(1), 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz349

Vancouver

Li J, Guasch-Ferré M, Li Y, Hu FB. Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2020;112(1):150-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz349

Author

Li, Jun ; Guasch-Ferré, Marta ; Li, Yanping ; Hu, Frank B. / Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality : systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2020 ; Vol. 112, No. 1. pp. 150-167.

Bibtex

@article{5e8deea6b3b04822b33906d28522263d,
title = "Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Current evidence on associations between intakes of linoleic acid (LA), the predominant n-6 (ω-6) fatty acid, and mortality is inconsistent and has not been summarized by a systematic review and meta-analysis.OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to examine associations between LA intake and mortality.METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through 31 July 2019 for prospective cohort studies reporting associations of LA (assessed by dietary surveys and/or LA concentrations in adipose tissue or blood compartments) with mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Multivariable-adjusted RRs were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies reporting 44 prospective cohorts were identified; these included 811,069 participants with dietary intake assessment (170,076 all-cause, 50,786 CVD, and 59,684 cancer deaths) and 65,411 participants with biomarker measurements (9758 all-cause, 6492 CVD, and 1719 cancer deaths). Pooled RRs comparing extreme categories of dietary LA intake (high vs low) were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94; I2 = 67.9%) for total mortality, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.92; I2 = 3.7%) for CVD mortality, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93; I2 = 0%) for cancer mortality. Pooled RRs for each SD increment in LA concentrations in adipose tissue/blood compartments were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95; I2 = 64.1%) for total mortality, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.94; I2 = 28.9%) for CVD mortality, and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98; I2 = 26.3%) for cancer mortality. Meta-regressions suggested baseline age and dietary assessment methods as potential sources of heterogeneity for the association between LA and total mortality.CONCLUSIONS: In prospective cohort studies, higher LA intake, assessed by dietary surveys or biomarkers, was associated with a modestly lower risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, and cancer. These data support the potential long-term benefits of PUFA intake in lowering the risk of CVD and premature death.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy, Fatty Acids, Omega-6/administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Linoleic Acid/administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms/drug therapy, Prospective Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult",
author = "Jun Li and Marta Guasch-Ferr{\'e} and Yanping Li and Hu, {Frank B}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1093/ajcn/nqz349",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "150--167",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0002-9165",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dietary intake and biomarkers of linoleic acid and mortality

T2 - systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

AU - Li, Jun

AU - Guasch-Ferré, Marta

AU - Li, Yanping

AU - Hu, Frank B

N1 - Copyright © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - BACKGROUND: Current evidence on associations between intakes of linoleic acid (LA), the predominant n-6 (ω-6) fatty acid, and mortality is inconsistent and has not been summarized by a systematic review and meta-analysis.OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to examine associations between LA intake and mortality.METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through 31 July 2019 for prospective cohort studies reporting associations of LA (assessed by dietary surveys and/or LA concentrations in adipose tissue or blood compartments) with mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Multivariable-adjusted RRs were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies reporting 44 prospective cohorts were identified; these included 811,069 participants with dietary intake assessment (170,076 all-cause, 50,786 CVD, and 59,684 cancer deaths) and 65,411 participants with biomarker measurements (9758 all-cause, 6492 CVD, and 1719 cancer deaths). Pooled RRs comparing extreme categories of dietary LA intake (high vs low) were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94; I2 = 67.9%) for total mortality, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.92; I2 = 3.7%) for CVD mortality, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93; I2 = 0%) for cancer mortality. Pooled RRs for each SD increment in LA concentrations in adipose tissue/blood compartments were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95; I2 = 64.1%) for total mortality, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.94; I2 = 28.9%) for CVD mortality, and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98; I2 = 26.3%) for cancer mortality. Meta-regressions suggested baseline age and dietary assessment methods as potential sources of heterogeneity for the association between LA and total mortality.CONCLUSIONS: In prospective cohort studies, higher LA intake, assessed by dietary surveys or biomarkers, was associated with a modestly lower risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, and cancer. These data support the potential long-term benefits of PUFA intake in lowering the risk of CVD and premature death.

AB - BACKGROUND: Current evidence on associations between intakes of linoleic acid (LA), the predominant n-6 (ω-6) fatty acid, and mortality is inconsistent and has not been summarized by a systematic review and meta-analysis.OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to examine associations between LA intake and mortality.METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through 31 July 2019 for prospective cohort studies reporting associations of LA (assessed by dietary surveys and/or LA concentrations in adipose tissue or blood compartments) with mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Multivariable-adjusted RRs were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies reporting 44 prospective cohorts were identified; these included 811,069 participants with dietary intake assessment (170,076 all-cause, 50,786 CVD, and 59,684 cancer deaths) and 65,411 participants with biomarker measurements (9758 all-cause, 6492 CVD, and 1719 cancer deaths). Pooled RRs comparing extreme categories of dietary LA intake (high vs low) were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.94; I2 = 67.9%) for total mortality, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.92; I2 = 3.7%) for CVD mortality, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93; I2 = 0%) for cancer mortality. Pooled RRs for each SD increment in LA concentrations in adipose tissue/blood compartments were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95; I2 = 64.1%) for total mortality, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.94; I2 = 28.9%) for CVD mortality, and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98; I2 = 26.3%) for cancer mortality. Meta-regressions suggested baseline age and dietary assessment methods as potential sources of heterogeneity for the association between LA and total mortality.CONCLUSIONS: In prospective cohort studies, higher LA intake, assessed by dietary surveys or biomarkers, was associated with a modestly lower risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, and cancer. These data support the potential long-term benefits of PUFA intake in lowering the risk of CVD and premature death.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy

KW - Fatty Acids, Omega-6/administration & dosage

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Linoleic Acid/administration & dosage

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasms/drug therapy

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1093/ajcn/nqz349

DO - 10.1093/ajcn/nqz349

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32020162

VL - 112

SP - 150

EP - 167

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0002-9165

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 357989009